Artificial Intelligence is no longer a future trend. It has already entered the daily operating model of modern businesses.

It is helping developers write code faster. It is helping marketers create campaigns. It is helping sales teams identify target accounts. It is helping service teams respond to customers. It is helping founders, consultants, agencies and IT service companies do more with smaller teams.

This shift is very visible in the IT and ITeS industry, but it is not limited to that sector. The same change is happening in consulting, SaaS, finance, healthcare, education, manufacturing, retail and professional services.

The reason is simple.

AI is extremely good at increasing speed.

It can draft content.
It can summarize information.
It can write first level code.
It can generate email campaigns.
It can classify leads.
It can support customer service.
It can prepare proposals.
It can analyse large volumes of information.

In many ways, AI is becoming the productivity layer of business.

But productivity is not the same as trust.

That is the real distinction business leaders need to understand.

AI can automate the journey.

Humans still carry the trust.

The AI Adoption Story Is Real, But It Is Not Complete

The data supports one thing very clearly. AI adoption is no longer small.

McKinsey’s 2025 State of AI survey found that 88 percent of organisations are now using AI in at least one business function. The same research also found that AI usage is spreading across IT, marketing, sales, knowledge management, software engineering and customer service.

So this is not a technology conversation anymore.

It is a business operating model conversation.

However, the same McKinsey research also shows the other side of the story. Most companies are still in experimentation or pilot mode. Only around one third have started scaling AI across the enterprise. Just 39 percent report measurable EBIT impact at the enterprise level.

This matters because it tells us something important.

Using AI is easy.

Getting business value from AI is harder.

Most organisations are still learning how to integrate AI into workflows, governance, customer journeys, decision making and delivery models. The companies seeing better results are not simply using more AI. They are redesigning how work gets done.

That is where the human role becomes more important, not less.

AI Is Strongest Where the Work Is Repeatable

In the IT and ITeS segment, many activities can now be automated or accelerated.

Programming teams can use AI for code suggestions, documentation, testing support, bug analysis and faster reviews.

Marketing teams can use AI for campaign drafts, newsletters, landing pages, product messaging and social media posts.

Sales teams can use AI for target account identification, lead research, email sequencing, pitch preparation and account intelligence.

Support teams can use AI for ticket summaries, response suggestions, categorisation and self service support.

This is useful.

In fact, for many day to day tasks, AI should be used. It saves time. It reduces repetitive effort. It improves first draft quality. It allows small teams to behave like larger teams. It gives medium and large companies more operating leverage.

There is no point resisting this shift.

But the mistake is to assume that because AI can produce more work, it automatically produces better business relationships.

That is where many companies are getting it wrong.

The Market Is Now Full of Automated Noise

AI has made content generation easy.

Very easy.

A business can create a blog in minutes.
A sales team can generate hundreds of outreach emails.
A marketing team can produce daily LinkedIn posts.
A founder can build a newsletter quickly.
A campaign manager can create multiple versions of the same message.

The problem is that buyers are also seeing this.

Their inboxes are full of automated outreach.

Their LinkedIn feeds are full of polished but generic posts.

Their newsletters are full of predictable insights.

Their sales conversations often start with messages that look personalised, but do not feel personal.

This is the new trust gap.

The content may be grammatically correct.
The structure may be professional.
The message may sound confident.

But if it does not show real understanding, the buyer ignores it.

In the AI era, content volume is no longer a competitive advantage.

Point of view is.

Relevance is.

Experience is.

Trust is.

AI can help create the first draft. But it cannot automatically create credibility. That still comes from human judgement, customer understanding and a clear point of view.

Buyers Do Not Treat Every Purchase the Same Way

This is where companies need to separate two types of buying journeys.

The first is a transactional journey.

The second is a trust based journey.

For transactional products, buyers often prefer digital first experiences.

For example, if a customer needs Microsoft 365, domain hosting, email hosting, SSL certificates, backup tools, endpoint protection, basic productivity software or standard subscriptions, they may not want a long human led sales process.

They want clarity.

They want pricing.

They want comparison.

They want fast activation.

They want reliable support.

They want a clean renewal process.

In such cases, automation is not a weakness. It is often the better customer experience.

A buyer does not always want to speak to a person for a routine purchase. Many buyers prefer self service when the need is clear, the risk is low and the product is standard.

But the same logic does not work for complex decisions.

If a company is planning cloud migration, cybersecurity transformation, ERP implementation, application modernisation, managed services, outsourcing, data transformation or business process automation, the buyer is not only purchasing technology.

The buyer is making a risk decision.

That buyer is asking deeper questions.

Can this partner understand our business?

Can they manage complexity?

Can they handle exceptions?

Can they protect us if something goes wrong?

Do they have relevant experience?

Will they be accountable after the contract is signed?

Can we trust them with something business critical?

This is where human interaction becomes essential.

In Complex Deals, Trust Is Part of the Product

For high value or consultative work, the buyer is not only buying a solution.

The buyer is buying confidence.

This is especially true in IT and ITeS because many projects directly affect operations, security, compliance, productivity and customer experience.

A cloud migration is not just a technical project. It affects business continuity.

A cybersecurity project is not just a tool purchase. It affects risk exposure.

An ERP implementation is not just software deployment. It affects finance, supply chain, people and process.

A managed service contract is not just outsourcing. It affects accountability.

In such cases, buyers need more than digital information.

They need conversation.

They need discovery.

They need workshops.

They need references.

They need proof.

They need to see how the partner thinks.

They need to know whether the team is mature enough to tell the truth, not just sell the product.

This is where AI cannot fully replace humans.

AI can prepare the research.
AI can summarise the account.
AI can create the proposal draft.
AI can support the business case.

But humans still have to build the confidence.

Humans still have to ask the right questions.

Humans still have to read the room.

Humans still have to handle doubt, risk, politics and emotion.

Humans still have to own the outcome.

B2B Buyers Want Digital, But Not Digital Only

A common mistake is to believe that modern buyers want everything to be digital.

That is not accurate.

Modern buyers want choice.

McKinsey’s B2B research has shown that B2B customers prefer omnichannel engagement. They want digital self service, remote interaction and human engagement depending on the stage and complexity of the buying journey.

This is important.

The future is not fully digital.

The future is not fully human.

The future is hybrid.

For simple purchases, digital can lead.

For complex purchases, human trust must lead.

For research, AI can support.

For decision making, humans still matter.

For awareness, automation can scale.

For conversion, trust is still critical.

This is the balance many companies have not understood yet.

Customer Trust in AI Is Still Fragile

There is another reason the human role remains important.

Customer trust in AI is still not fully mature.

Public research around AI based customer service shows a clear pattern. Customers may accept AI when it is fast, useful and transparent. But they become frustrated when AI blocks access to humans, gives poor answers or creates dead ends.

A recent YouGov survey commissioned by Pega found that 68 percent of respondents lacked confidence in how businesses use generative AI for customer interactions. The same research found that 80 percent of consumers often achieve better outcomes with human support, while only 2 percent wanted chatbot only engagement.

This is a warning sign.

Customers are not rejecting AI completely.

They are rejecting bad AI experiences.

They are rejecting automation that removes control.

They are rejecting systems that feel impersonal, inaccurate or unaccountable.

That is why the question is not, “Should we use AI?”

The better question is, “Where does AI improve the customer experience, and where does it damage trust?”

AI Productivity Needs Human Oversight

Even in software development, where AI is one of the strongest use cases, the story is not simply “AI replaces developers.”

GitHub’s research on Copilot found that developers using Copilot completed a coding task 55 percent faster in a controlled experiment.

That is a strong productivity signal.

But even this does not mean AI removes the need for skilled developers.

Code still needs review.

Architecture still needs judgement.

Security still needs expertise.

Performance still needs validation.

Maintainability still needs experienced engineering thinking.

AI can help developers move faster, but speed without quality can create technical debt. That is why the best engineering teams will not treat AI as a replacement for engineering discipline. They will treat it as a productivity tool inside a strong human led development process.

The same principle applies to marketing, sales, consulting and service delivery.

AI can help create the work.

Humans must ensure the work is right.

The Real Risk Is Not AI. The Real Risk Is Lazy Automation.

The biggest danger is not that companies will use AI.

The danger is that companies will use AI without thinking.

Lazy automation looks like this:

Sending more emails without improving relevance.

Publishing more content without adding insight.

Automating customer service without solving customer problems.

Using AI generated proposals without understanding the client.

Replacing conversations with templates.

Treating personalisation as a name field in an email.

Using AI to increase volume while reducing authenticity.

This will not build trust.

It may even damage it.

Because buyers are becoming more sensitive to generic communication. They can identify when a message is mass produced. They can feel when there is no real thought behind it.

In a world where everyone can generate content, the advantage will move to those who can generate trust.

The Pitch Has to Move From Features to Outcomes

This is where IT and ITeS professionals need to change their approach.

Many companies still lead with features, pricing, certifications and technical capabilities.

Those things matter, but they are not enough.

Customers are asking a more important question:

What outcome can you deliver for my business?

Will you reduce risk?

Will you improve productivity?

Will you reduce downtime?

Will you improve security?

Will you simplify operations?

Will you improve customer experience?

Will you help us scale?

Will you reduce cost without creating hidden complexity?

That is the real conversation.

The strongest companies will not lead with “what we sell.”

They will lead with “what we solve.”

They will not only talk about tools.

They will talk about business impact.

They will not only show credentials.

They will show judgement.

They will not only promise delivery.

They will demonstrate accountability.

This is where humans remain central.

AI can help prepare the pitch. But the credibility of the pitch comes from the people behind it.

What IT and ITeS Professionals Should Do Now

The professionals who grow in this market will not be the ones who reject AI.

They will also not be the ones who automate everything blindly.

The winners will be the ones who combine AI leverage with human depth.

They will use AI for research, preparation, summarisation, account intelligence, first drafts, campaign planning and operational efficiency.

But they will use human judgement for discovery, positioning, consulting, negotiation, relationship building and outcome ownership.

They will know when to automate.

They will also know when to pick up the phone.

They will know when a buyer wants speed.

They will also know when a buyer needs reassurance.

They will know when digital is enough.

They will also know when human presence changes the decision.

This is the new professional skill.

Not AI usage alone.

AI judgement.

This Applies Beyond IT and ITeS

The IT and ITeS industry is a strong lens because it is close to AI adoption, automation and digital transformation.

But the principle is not limited to IT.

It applies to any business where there are two types of customer journeys.

One journey is transactional.

The other is trust based.

A customer may buy a subscription online, but they may want human advice for a transformation project.

A business may renew a standard tool digitally, but it may want a senior conversation before changing a core system.

A customer may accept AI for routine support, but they may want a person when the issue is sensitive, complex or urgent.

This applies to SaaS, consulting, finance, healthcare, education, legal services, real estate, manufacturing and professional services.

AI is excellent where speed, scale and repeatability matter.

Humans are essential where judgement, trust and accountability matter.

Final Thought

AI will continue to transform business.

It will make teams faster.
It will reduce repetitive work.
It will improve research.
It will support coding, marketing, sales, service and operations.
It will help companies reach more people with less effort.

But the future will not belong to companies that simply automate everything.

The future will belong to companies that know what to automate and what to humanise.

Transactional journeys can be digital first.

Consultative journeys must remain trust first.

AI can help companies reach more buyers.

Humans will still help buyers believe.

That is the balance business leaders need to get right.

AI can automate the journey.

Humans still carry the trust.

Sources
This article is informed by public research from McKinsey, GitHub, Edelman and YouGov supported customer experience research.

McKinsey’s 2025 State of AI survey found that 88 percent of organisations use AI in at least one business function, but only 39 percent report enterprise level EBIT impact from AI, showing the gap between adoption and measurable value. https://www.mckinsey.com/capabilities/quantumblack/our-insights/the-state-of-ai

McKinsey’s B2B Pulse research shows that B2B buyers want omnichannel engagement, including digital self service, remote interaction and human engagement, depending on the buying stage and complexity. https://www.mckinsey.com/capabilities/growth-marketing-and-sales/our-insights/the-new-b2b-growth-equation

GitHub’s Copilot research found that developers using Copilot completed a controlled coding task 55 percent faster than those not using Copilot, supporting the productivity argument while still leaving room for human review, quality and engineering judgement. https://github.blog/2022-09-07-research-quantifying-github-copilots-impact-on-developer-productivity-and-happiness/

Edelman’s 2024 Trust Barometer, based on 32,000 respondents across 28 countries, found that innovation acceptance depends heavily on trust, transparency, control and confidence that innovation will lead to a better future. https://www.edelman.com/trust/2024/trust-barometer

A YouGov survey commissioned by Pega, reported by ITPro, found that 68 percent of respondents lacked confidence in how businesses use generative AI for customer interactions, while 80 percent said they often achieve better outcomes with human support and only 2 percent wanted chatbot only engagement. https://www.itpro.com/technology/artificial-intelligence/your-customers-arent-keen-on-that-customer-service-chatbot-you-introduced-heres-why?utm_source=chatgpt.com

Reply

Avatar

or to participate

Keep Reading